• 2017-0127 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/21/17), 232 So.3d 29

    Represented corporate defendant and individual against whom civil judgment of forfeiture was ordered following service of process on individual defendant. The First Circuit Court of Appeal, in reversing the trial court, held that a general power of attorney permitting an agent to represent another in matters of litigation, while not specifically designating the individual as agent for service of process, is insufficient to constitute such a designation. Consequently, service of process on that agent is without effect. Since service was not made as required by law, portions of judgment against the corporation and individual owner were a nullity.